10x visium spatial transcriptomics slide (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)
Structured Review

10x Visium Spatial Transcriptomics Slide, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/10x visium spatial transcriptomics slide/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Uncovering the Regional and Cell Specific Bioactivity of Injectable Extracellular Matrix Biomaterials in Myocardial Infarction through Spatial and Single Nucleus Transcriptomics"
Article Title: Uncovering the Regional and Cell Specific Bioactivity of Injectable Extracellular Matrix Biomaterials in Myocardial Infarction through Spatial and Single Nucleus Transcriptomics
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2025.06.25.661525
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) MI was induced followed by an intramyocardial injection of ECM hydrogel or saline 7 days post-MI. Hearts were then harvested for either snRNAseq or spatial transcriptomics 7 days post-injection (14 days post-MI). Sample size: n = 2 ECM hydrogel replicates, 7658 spots. (b) Myocardium (green) was labelled with anti-alpha-actinin antibody alongside fluorescently tagged ECM hydrogel (light blue). (c) The adjacent cryosection was used for spatial transcriptomics via 10X Visium, where the infarct containing ECM hydrogel (red) was found to cluster separately from the infarct alone (cyan). (d) The top upregulated differentially expressed genes defining the ECM hydrogel zone (red) were found to be immune and vascularly dominating genes compared to the down regulated genes impacting the infarct zone (cyan). (e-f) All differentially expressed genes in the ECM hydrogel zone (red) and infarct only zone were subjected to GO enrichment.
Techniques Used: Injection, Saline
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) MI is induced followed by an intramyocardial injection of ECM hydrogel or saline 8 weeks post-MI. Hearts are then harvested for either snRNAseq or spatial transcriptomics 7 days post-injection. Sample size: n = 3 ECM hydrogel replicates, 9594 spots. (b) Myocardium (green) was labelled with an anti-alpha-actinin antibody alongside fluorescently tagged ECM hydrogel (light blue). (c) An adjacent cryosection to the immunofluorescence image in b was used for spatial transcriptomics via 10X Visium, where the infarct containing ECM hydrogel (red) was found to cluster separately from the normal infarct zone (cyan). (d) Top differentially expressed genes for both ECM within infarct (red) and infarct alone (cyan) are shown. (e-f) A comparison of the two zones reflects the ECM hydrogel activates fibroblasts and is responsible for further vascular development, as demonstrated through GO enrichment.
Techniques Used: Injection, Saline, Immunofluorescence, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) The top upregulated differentially expressed genes defining the ECM hydrogel zone (red) with integrated subacute and chronic Visium were found to be immune, fibroblast, and vascularly dominating genes compared to the downregulated genes impacting the infarct zone (cyan). Sample size: n = 2 for subacute ECM hydrogel (7658 spots); n = 3 for chronic ECM hydrogel (9594 spots) (b) The ECM zones in both subacute and chronic models of MI have higher expression of the matrix specific genes relative to the infarct zone. (c-f) Macrophages (c) , endothelial cells (d) , cardiomyocytes (e) , and fibroblasts (f) treated with ECM hydrogel in subacute and chronic MI were subsetted, reclustered and compared with respect to MI timepoint. Sample size: n = 2 subacute ECM hydrogel (downsampled to 3000 cells), n = 2 chronic ECM hydrogel (downsampled to 3000 cells). Top differentially expressed genes were displayed via Volcano Plot, and the differentially expressed genes were subjected to GO enrichment. (g) Comparison of transcriptomic findings between subacute and chronic MI.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Comparison

Table S5 ). (J) Macrophage and myofibroblast abundances, based on deconvolution of bulk-mRNA sequencing (as in I). Treated samples were compared per time point (day 3 or 28), separately by two-tailed unpaired Student t test. Results are represented as mean ± SEM. " width="250" height="auto" />